Sunday, December 03, 2006

Trade Review: TUES

I am starting a new feature. Inspired by Bill, Trader X, Tapeworm, Ugly, and others I have decided to discuss trades I have made. These early trades were made as an educational endeavor to understand buying and selling of stocks using minimal amounts of capital. For the most part I bought and sold these shares as I developed my investing and trading process.


I had followed TUES for several months as it slid from $23.00 in the spring to the low teens by mid-summer as can be seen from this chart.

After reading the annual reports, looking at the numbers of the last several years, and visiting the local store, I felt that the company would be a good investment. Looking at the above chart I had noticed that it hit $12.11 in early July, bounced back and found support in the high $12 low $13 area in late August-early September. By mid-September I felt (based on fundamental research and price action) that it would be a good time to buy. So I bought. And then I sold. Let’s look at the results.


On September 12, 2006, I bought Tuesday Morning (TUES) at $13.23. I can’t really say that there was any particular “signal” that stood out, so I would not disagree describing it as a random entry as discussed in Trade Your Way to Financial Freedom.

On September 28, 2006, I sold Tuesday Morning (TUES) at $14.20.

I had a gain of $0.97 cents a share or just about 7% in 16 days. Why did I sell so soon? I am a FNG that’s why. When you are JAFO as I am at this point and make 7% in sixteen days, I say “thank you very much I will take my money and go home now, please.”

At the time I did not understand the Average True Range or how to use it. In hindsight the ATR (using a 15 day period) was .0373 on the day I bought. Applying Bill Rempel’s “Super Size” formula my downside risk would be $1.12. Obviously in hindsight I sold way to soon and missed the big part of the move, but it could have turned out just as easily that I bought too soon and bounced off the 20 or 50 MA instead of waiting to see it cross-over, as it did several days later.

Getting back to the R (or Z as Tapeworm calls it) now that I have read Trader Mike’s blog (and Van Tharp’s book) I know that I should have measured R and trailed the stop. Using the closing prices as a marker, TUES hit $18.04 on November 16 and $16.89 in the big sell-off on November 27th. So using a trailing stop of $1.12 my actual gain would have been about $3.66 and not the $0.97 I actually received. So while I made .86 R, if I had used a trailing stop I would have been out with about 3.26 R. For the anti-R group the difference was the 7% made against the unrealized potential of 21%.

Bottom Line

I would like to believe that my selection was based on some skill on my part. Or it could have been luck. Or it might have been that oil took a dump in September and pulled up the whole retail sector. What I do know for sure is 1) I made some money, but could have easily lost some as well; and 2) I need to use a trailing stop.


john said...

nice trade...7% in 16 days is great...glad to see you in the R camp

Anonymous said...

You TRADE? hehehehe

Steven said...

T'goddess: Not very well..and never against you.

Anonymous said...


Looks like you aren't doing too bad! Congrats! :)

Anonymous said...

I don't understand this kind of analysis either, but, the way I look at it, there is always other opportunity if you sold too soon.

I think taking a profit like that is always a good approach. And sure, with some you sell too soon, look at other that you sold and calculate their downside into it, and I think it averages out.

Steven said...

Deborah: Yo make a good point.

The point for me is not that taking a profit is bad; it is the taking a profit for no reason.

penny stocks said...

I have a web site where I give advise on penny stocks and stocks under five dollars. I have many many years of experience with these type of stocks. If their is anyone that is interested in these type of stocks you can check out my web site by just clicking penny stocks. I would like to take a moment to talk about low price stocks not classic penny stocks or stocks under one dollar the term most people most often think of when the word penny stock is used. Their are companies of really decent quality trading under five dollars’ but for every one company trading under five dollars that is of decent quality their are maybe ten of poor quality. So the really big difference between those investors that are tremendously successfull when it comes to investing in low price stocks and those investors that lose enormous amounts of money investing in stocks under five dollars’ is having a great deal of knowledge and experience when it comes to low price stocks’ or having a total lack of knowledge and experience when it comes to low price stocks. Finding quality stocks under five dollars requires a lot more research than finding a decent stock above ten dollars.


Excellent review on trading.